There is a subtle difference between being a disciple of Scripture and being a disciple of the One to whom Scripture bears witness. Jesus exposed this tension clearly in John 5:24–38. He spoke to people who knew the texts, revered the law, and searched the Scriptures diligently—yet somehow missed the living Word standing before them. Their devotion to written authority had become a substitute for relational obedience. Jesus’ rebuke was not against Scripture itself, but against the misuse of Scripture as a shield against surrender. “You search the Scriptures because you think that in them you have eternal life; and it is they that testify on my behalf. Yet you refuse to come to me to have life.” Eternal life, He insists, is not found in textual mastery but in relational trust.
This distinction becomes even clearer when read alongside Galatians 5:1: “Stand fast therefore in the liberty by which Christ has made us free, and do not be entangled again with a yoke of bondage.” Paul is not warning against moral seriousness, but against confusing freedom in Christ with the re-imposition of spiritual constraints that Christ Himself never required. Christian liberty is not license to do whatever feels right; it is freedom to do what is right under the lordship of Jesus. The paradox is that freedom is found not in autonomy, but in obedience rightly ordered.
Oswald Chambers captured this tension with penetrating clarity when he wrote, “A spiritually minded man or woman will never come to you with the demand, ‘Believe this and that,’ but with the demand that you square your life with the standards of Jesus.” Chambers recognized that the gospel does not spread primarily through argument or coercion, but through conscience awakened by Christ’s authority. The goal of discipleship is not uniformity of opinion, but conformity of life to Jesus Himself. Scripture serves this end by revealing Christ, not by replacing Him.
This is why Jesus’ words in John 5 are so unsettling. The religious leaders had turned Scripture into a system of control rather than a pathway to communion. They believed correctly in many respects, yet their belief had become detached from obedience to Christ’s presence and voice. In contrast, Jesus calls His followers into what might be called liberty of conscience rather than liberty of view. Christian freedom does not mean everyone must agree on every secondary matter, but that each conscience is governed by Christ’s lordship. When Christ reigns in the conscience, truth is neither diluted nor weaponized.
The danger Chambers names is not merely theoretical. It shows up whenever believers bind burdens on others that Jesus Himself never placed there. Jesus warned against this explicitly, criticizing leaders who “tie up heavy burdens, hard to bear, and lay them on the shoulders of others” (Matthew 23:4). True discipleship measures life by the standards of Jesus, not by the comfort of our traditions or the security of our interpretations. To bow the neck to Christ’s yoke alone is to refuse every other yoke—whether it comes from fear, pride, group identity, or spiritual impatience.
Yet this freedom requires patience. Chambers wisely reminds us to remember how gently God dealt with us. None of us arrived at obedience overnight. The Spirit works incrementally, reshaping conscience through truth and grace together. Impatience with others often reveals unresolved impatience with God’s timing in our own lives. At the same time, patience must never become an excuse to soften truth. Love does not require apology for what God has spoken clearly. It requires humility in how that truth is lived and shared.
Jesus’ final commission reinforces this balance. He did not say, “Go and make converts to your opinions,” but “Go and make disciples.” Disciples are formed through relationship, imitation, and submission to Christ’s authority. Opinions may change; Christ’s lordship does not. When liberty is rightly understood, it becomes contagious—not because it persuades, but because it frees. Those who live under Christ’s yoke invite others into that same freedom simply by the integrity of their lives.
On Second Thought
On second thought, the greatest threat to Christian freedom may not be obvious bondage, but invisible substitution. We substitute certainty for obedience, agreement for discipleship, and correct belief for transformed conscience. The paradox is that many of us fear losing truth if we loosen our grip on control, when in reality we lose truth most quickly when we use it to dominate rather than to submit. Jesus never asked for intellectual uniformity; He asked for allegiance. He never demanded that everyone see exactly as we do, but that all would see Him.
This reframes how we approach both Scripture and one another. If the Bible is primarily a witness to Christ rather than a tool to enforce compliance, then our task is not to make others think like us, but to help them listen to Him. Liberty of conscience does not mean relativism; it means responsibility before Christ. Each believer stands or falls before the same Lord, guided by the same Spirit, shaped by the same truth—yet formed uniquely through grace.
Perhaps the more unsettling question is whether we truly trust Christ to govern the consciences of others without our constant intervention. It takes faith to release people into Christ’s care rather than binding them to our expectations. It also takes courage to remain under Christ’s yoke ourselves, resisting the urge to exchange it for something heavier but more familiar. True freedom is not the absence of restraint, but the right restraint—the restraint that comes from love, truth, and submission to Jesus alone.
FEEL FREE TO COMMENT, SUBSCRIBE, AND REPOST, SO OTHERS MAY KNOW