The Bible in a Year
“Behold, these caused the children of Israel, through the counsel of Balaam, to commit trespass against the Lord in the matter of Peor, and there was a plague among the congregation of the Lord.” — Numbers 31:16
As we move through the Book of Numbers in our year-long journey through Scripture, we encounter a sobering footnote to a familiar story. Balaam is remembered for his talking donkey and his reluctant blessings over Israel, yet here in Numbers 31 we discover something far more troubling—his counsel. Though he could not curse Israel directly, he found another way to harm them. Revelation 2:14 later confirms that Balaam taught Balak to put a stumbling block before the people of God. When open attack failed, subtle compromise succeeded.
Moses, understandably upset, confronts the soldiers for sparing the Midianite women. He connects their presence to the “matter of Peor,” referring back to Numbers 25, where Israel fell into idolatry and immorality. The Hebrew word for “trespass” here conveys unfaithfulness—ma‘al—a breach of covenant loyalty. Balaam’s counsel led Israel into spiritual adultery. He suggested that doctrine did not matter, that Israel could mingle worship with Midianite practices without consequence.
This is the first warning embedded in the text: creed matters. The sin at Peor was not merely cultural interaction; it was theological compromise. Israel participated in idol worship, denying in practice the uniqueness of Yahweh. Deuteronomy 6:4 declares, “Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is one.” The unity and exclusivity of God’s covenant claim cannot be shared with Baal or any substitute. In our time, the temptation to minimize doctrinal clarity in the name of harmony is strong. Yet Scripture consistently warns that truth shapes life. As John Stott once observed, “We must allow the Word of God to confront us, disturb our security, undermine our complacency, and overthrow our patterns of thought and behavior.” Doctrine is not cold theory; it is the guardrail of fidelity.
The second layer of Balaam’s counsel involved companions. The Israelites became “chummy,” to borrow a familiar phrase, with the Midianites. This was not ordinary neighborly interaction but covenant entanglement. Paul echoes the principle centuries later in 1 Corinthians 15:33: “Do not be deceived: ‘Bad company corrupts good morals.’” Separation in Scripture is not about arrogance; it is about preservation of devotion. Balaam’s advice rejected the idea that proximity to idolatry and immorality would affect God’s people. But history—and personal experience—tells us otherwise. We are relational beings. What we tolerate in close fellowship often shapes what we accept in our own conduct.
That leads naturally to conduct. Numbers 31:16 speaks of “trespass,” and the narrative in Numbers 25 details immorality. The counsel lowered moral standards. What once would have been unthinkable became normalized. This is the steady drift of compromise. Sin rarely storms the gates; it seeps through neglected watchtowers. When moral boundaries soften, covenant identity erodes. Balaam did not need Israel to renounce Yahweh formally; he only needed them to blend loyalties.
In our contemporary context, the pressure to adjust biblical moral teaching to cultural preference is intense. Even within Christian circles, divorce, sexual ethics, and integrity are often reframed through the lens of personal fulfillment rather than covenant obedience. Yet the New Testament maintains continuity with the Old. Hebrews 13:4 declares, “Marriage is honorable among all, and the bed undefiled; but fornicators and adulterers God will judge.” The Bible’s call to holiness is not outdated rigidity but loving protection. God’s standards are not arbitrary restrictions; they are expressions of His character.
Finally, the text speaks of chastisement. “There was a plague among the congregation of the Lord.” Balaam’s counsel ignored divine judgment. In Numbers 25, twenty-four thousand died. The Hebrew term for plague carries the idea of a blow or stroke—divine intervention to halt destructive rebellion. Judgment in Scripture is never capricious. It is corrective and revealing. It exposes the seriousness of sin and the faithfulness of God to His covenant. To dismiss judgment is to misunderstand holiness.
R. T. Kendall once wrote, “God’s discipline is proof of His love, not the absence of it.” Israel’s plague was not evidence that God had abandoned them; it was evidence that He refused to let corruption define them. The seriousness of chastisement underscores the seriousness of compromise.
As we reflect on Balaam’s counsel, I am compelled to ask myself: Where am I tempted to minimize doctrine for convenience? Where have I grown comfortable in companionships that subtly erode devotion? Have I softened moral standards in ways I once would have resisted? And do I take divine judgment seriously—not in fear, but in reverent awareness of God’s holiness?
The beauty of walking through the Bible in a year is that we encounter not only comforting promises but cautionary narratives. Numbers 31:16 is a warning flare in redemptive history. It reminds us that spiritual compromise often begins with counsel that sounds reasonable. Balaam never openly declared war on Israel; he simply advised accommodation.
Yet the gospel provides hope beyond warning. Christ is our faithful Mediator, the One Balaam’s compromise denied. He calls us not to isolation from the world but to holiness within it. As we continue this journey through Scripture, let us hold firmly to truth, guard our fellowship wisely, pursue moral integrity, and respond humbly to correction.
For further study on Balaam and the matter of Peor, you may find this overview from The Gospel Coalition helpful: https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/article/balaam-bible/
May today’s reading strengthen our resolve to remain faithful. The counsel we heed shapes the life we live.
FEEL FREE TO COMMENT, SUBSCRIBE, AND REPOST, SO OTHERS MAY KNOW