Why NZ’s Abortion Legislation Bill Fails So Badly

… Bob McCoskrieSHARE As New Zealand introduces a new bill aimed at legalizing abortion, Bob McCoskrie takes a look at its impact… __________ Below is a summary of specific problems with the Abortion Legalisation Bill

POLICY FAIL To remove legislation about abortion from the criminal code and insert it to the health code is to equate a procedure to remove an unborn baby with a procedure to remove an appendix, kidney stones, gall bladder or tonsils – simply ’tissue’ removed as part of a ‘health procedure’. This denies the humanity of the baby and again, creates inconsistency with other legislation and public health messaging which clearly recognises the rights of the unborn child. Anybody who has viewed the ultrasound of an unborn child will know that this policy is a gross abuse of human rights. WHEN DOES LIFE BEGIN? Jacinda Ardern (New Zealand’s Prime Minister) refuses to answer the question put to her by 12 women who have had an abortion and had their full-page Open Letter to the PM published in the major daily newspapers last month. The women asked the PM when does she believe life begins. They say that a failure to answer that question may result in inadvertently killing human beings rather than merely ‘removing human tissue’. The real question we should be debating is at what point does the unborn child become a human being deserving of the same human rights and protections that we all receive and enjoy. LATE-TERM ABORTIONS Late term abortions will increase. Currently the Crimes Act allows for an abortion after 20 weeks gestation only in exceptional circumstances. Statistics NZ data shows that 800 late term abortions have been performed over the last 10 years where there was no danger to the physical health or life of the mother – 91% of all late term abortions. The proposed bill means that late term abortions will be available to women if the abortion provider “reasonably believes the abortion is appropriate in all the circumstances,” having regard to the woman’s physical and mental health and wellbeing. This is a very broad subjective test For abortions after 20 weeks, the terms “physical health” “mental health” and “wellbeing” are not defined by the Bill. The “gestational age” to be considered is not defined. On a natural reading these terms are broad and unrestrictive. Given the policy intent to make abortion more accessible, it is difficult to see many instances in which an abortion would reasonably be refused. Justice Minister Andrew Little has admitted that late-term abortions up to birth can happen under proposed abortion law. A baby could be aborted after 20-weeks as long as the abortionist who intends to perform the abortion considered that the abortion was ‘appropriate in the circumstances’ with a ‘nod’ from a colleague (another abortion provider!) The Bill has been drafted in such a way that an abortion can legally be obtained up until the point that a child has been fully born – irrelevant to what the politicians may promise or claim PARENTAL NOTIFICATION There’s no proposal to prevent schools from taking young women for an abortion without parental knowledge. In fact, the Bill removes all safeguards prior to 20 weeks, including for a pregnant child who could access an abortion on demand. A young teen could simply self-refer without any safeguards. COERCION & SUPPORTo provisions are proposed to protect women and young girls from being coerced into an abortion as a result of abuse or coercion from a boyfriend or family member No provisions are proposed for ensuring women have the mental-health support they need before and after abortion, or that women are made fully aware of the risks of abortion, and of all of their options SEX SELECTIVE ABORTIONS There’s no proposal to specifically prevent sex-selective abortion, except for a ‘tut-tut-tut we don’t like it’ provision The Bill also waters down the freedom of conscience rights for health practitioners, who would be required to provide information to women about abortion service providers. The effect of the ability for an employer to refuse to hire someone, or to terminate their employment, on the grounds of their conscientious objection is concerning LOOSE DEFINITION OF ‘HEALTH PRACTITIONER’ There is no requirement in the Bill that the Qualified Health Practitioner who provides abortion services, at any point in a woman’s pregnancy, is a doctor. In fact, the Bill specifically uses the term “Health Practitioner” rather than “Medical Practitioner” thereby broadening the category of person empowered to certify and carry out abortions beyond just doctors GESTATIONAL TIME LIMIT FOR DISABILITIES The bill would also remove the current 20-week gestational time limit for disability. Jacinda Ardern has also betrayed her promise to the Down syndrome community. In 2017 during the election campaign, the organisation Saving Down’s highlighted their concerns around Jacinda Ardern’s pledge to change abortion laws, saying that this would introduce abortion through to birth for babies with disabilities. In response, Jacinda Ardern made a commitment to not increase the time limit for disability-selective abortion. In the UK, there are increasing numbers of late term abortions for conditions such as such as cleft lip and palate or club foot. PUBLIC OPPOSITION More than 90% of submissions opposed the bill Almost 95% of submitters who wanted to speak to the committee were denied Polling has found that only 4% of New Zealanders want more liberal time limits for abortion Polling last year found strong support for the unborn child having human rights and being legally protected once a heartbeat is detected – which can be between 6–12 weeks – and only a small minority thinking that life doesn’t begin until the child is born *** Bob McCoskrie is the National Director of Family First, New Zealand

Published by Intentional Faith

Devoted to a Faith that Thinks

One thought on “Why NZ’s Abortion Legislation Bill Fails So Badly

  1. Once they’ve chosen to replace good with evil, there is very little you can say or do to change them. All are bought and paid for by Satan, and he has blinded their eyes, stopped their ears, and clouded their minds, so that no amount of righteous words or reasoned thoughts can come close to rescuing them. They have chosen to follow Satan, and forsaken their Lord. They may enjoy whatever they think they’re doing right now, but one day they will stand before the Lord and He will have something to say that they won’t be able to ignore.

    Like

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: